Franchise Brand Teardown
Woodhouse Spa franchise unit economics — a 3.3× gap between the top and bottom quartile.
Woodhouse’s Item 19 does something unusual: it bands franchised locations into performance quartiles instead of publishing one system average. The picture is stark. The top 25% averaged $4,308,376 in gross sales; the bottom 25% averaged $1,318,522. Same brand, same playbook, same fee structure — a 3.3× gap between bands, and an 8.4× gap between the strongest and weakest single location.
Where a Woodhouse Spa location actually lands.
An 8.4× spread between best and worst inside one system is the most important fact on this page. The brand sets the ceiling; the operator and the site determine the outcome.
Gross sales and gift card sales by band.
Gift cards are broken out separately, and they are a large share of the business — roughly 35% of gross sales system-wide, rising to 36% in the top band.
| Band (FY2025) | Locations | Avg gross sales | Median gross sales | Avg gift card sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top 25% | 21 | $4,308,376 | $3,932,921 | $1,543,466 |
| Top 50% | 41 | $3,429,320 | $3,151,894 | $1,215,336 |
| Bottom 50% | 40 | $1,376,214 | $1,789,306 | $477,808 |
| Bottom 25% | 20 | $1,318,522 | $1,367,978 | $486,204 |
| All locations | 81 | $2,406,193 | $2,155,304 | $851,161 |
Gross sales ranged from $816,325 at the weakest location to $6,830,937 at the strongest.
Three-year trend.
System averages have risen steadily, though the reporting population changes each year as new locations clear the criteria.
| Year | Reporting locations | Avg gross sales | Median gross sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 71 | $2,242,571 | $2,072,872 |
| 2024 | 76 | $2,332,326 | $2,145,438 |
| 2025 | 81 | $2,406,193 | $2,155,304 |
The company-owned profitability window.
Franchised-location Item 19 discloses sales only, with no cost data. But the franchisor also discloses profitability for its four company-owned spas — the only margin signal in the document. Treat it as indicative, not representative: n=4, all in Texas and Colorado, all open three or more years.
| Company-owned spas (n=4, FY2025) | Average | % of gross sales |
|---|---|---|
| Gross sales | $3,029,450 | — |
| Cost of sales | $414,318 | 13.7% |
| Personnel costs | $1,336,933 | 44.1% |
| Lease expense | $364,432 | 12.0% |
| Advertising & marketing | $154,140 | 5.1% |
| Royalty fee | $181,767 | 6.0% |
| Other operating expenses | $93,269 | 3.1% |
| Spa-level EBITDA | $484,591 | 16.0% |
Company-owned spa-level EBITDA ranged from $454,044 to $1,142,217, with a median of $521,065.
What separates the top Woodhouse Spa performers.
Woodhouse discloses in performance quartiles rather than a single average, which makes the spread the central fact of the filing: the top 25% averaged $4,308,376 against $1,318,522 for the bottom 25%, inside one system with identical brand, playbook, and fee load.
Decided before you open
- Trade area and site. A 3.3× gap between quartiles, and 8.4× between the strongest and weakest single location, is not an operating gap. Median household income, daytime population, and retail adjacency set the ceiling before the first appointment is booked.
- Treatment room count and square footage. The franchisor requires at least 3,000 sq ft under current brand standards, with locations typically running 5,000–7,000. Revenue capacity is a direct function of rooms multiplied by hours multiplied by utilization — and rooms are fixed at build.
- Lease economics. Lease expense ran 12.0% of gross sales in the company-owned window. On a location landing in the bottom quartile, the same absolute rent becomes a far heavier percentage — which is how a weak Woodhouse Spa site compounds into a weak P&L.
Live operating levers
- Personnel cost, the dominant line. 44.1% of gross sales in the company-owned disclosure, against a 16.0% spa-level EBITDA. Therapist productivity, room utilization by daypart, and the balance of commission to base are where this is won. Small movements here move the bottom line disproportionately, because nothing else in the structure is nearly as large.
- Gift card program depth. Gift cards averaged $851,161 — roughly 35% of gross sales, rising to about 36% in the top quartile. The top performers are not incidentally selling more gift cards; they are running a deliberate seasonal program. This is also the defining accounting feature of the model: a gift card is deferred revenue until redeemed, so cash and earned revenue routinely arrive in different periods.
- Membership and rebooking. Recurring visits convert a high-fixed-cost box from an appointment business into a subscription one, smoothing the utilization that drives the personnel line.
- Service and retail mix. Retail attachment and higher-margin service tiers lift revenue per treatment hour without adding rooms or hours — the only lever that raises the ceiling without capital.
Context you underwrite around
- Reporting screen. The 81 reporting locations exclude those open less than a full year, franchisor-owned, or under 3,000 sq ft. The disclosed figures describe stabilized locations meeting current brand standards.
- What the disclosure omits. Franchised Item 19 reports sales only, with no franchisee cost data. The four company-owned spas are the only margin signal in the document, and they are mature locations the franchisor operates itself in two states.
Questions worth putting to Woodhouse.
- What distinguishes the top-quartile locations from the bottom — trade area, tenure, square footage, or operator profile?
- What is average treatment-room utilization by daypart, and what do the strongest locations run?
- How do gift card redemption rates and breakage behave, and how are unredeemed balances handled across states?
- What is personnel cost as a percentage of sales across the franchised base, not only the four company-owned spas?
- How long does a new location take to reach stabilized revenue, and what does the ramp curve look like?
The operating gap, read from the disclosure.
The quartile bands invite an obvious question: what is the top group actually doing differently? The filing does not report operating metrics for franchised locations — no utilization, no ticket average, no rebooking rate — so anyone claiming precise figures on those is guessing. What the disclosure does support is a structural read, and it points somewhere more useful than “sell harder.”
Volume is the whole spread, and fixed cost is why it compounds.
Median gross sales run $3,932,921 in the top quartile against $1,367,978 in the bottom — a difference of $2,564,943 on locations operating from broadly similar footprints under the same brand standards. Because treatment rooms, lease, and management are largely fixed, that revenue gap does not produce a proportional profit gap. It produces a much larger one.
The company-owned P&L makes the mechanism concrete. Lease expense there was $364,432, or 12.0% of gross sales at $3,029,450. Hold that same rent constant and change only the revenue:
| Applied to | Gross sales | Same $364,432 rent |
|---|---|---|
| Top-quartile average | $4,308,376 | 8.5% |
| Company-owned average | $3,029,450 | 12.0% |
| System average | $2,406,193 | 15.1% |
| Bottom-quartile average | $1,318,522 | 27.6% |
Nobody in that table negotiated a worse lease. It is the same rent. A weak-volume location is not merely earning less — it is carrying a fundamentally heavier cost structure on every fixed line, which is how a revenue shortfall becomes a margin collapse.
Gift cards are not the differentiator — which is the surprise.
Gift card sales are large in absolute terms: $1,543,466 in the top quartile against $486,204 in the bottom, roughly a 3.2× gap. It would be easy to read that as a top-performer behavior. But scaled against each band’s own sales, the picture inverts:
| Band | Avg gross sales | Avg gift card sales | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top 25% | $4,308,376 | $1,543,466 | 35.8% |
| All locations | $2,406,193 | $851,161 | 35.4% |
| Bottom 25% | $1,318,522 | $486,204 | 36.9% |
Gift card share is essentially flat across the system, and marginally higher at the bottom. Both groups sell gift cards at the same intensity relative to their size. The top quartile is not out-executing on gift cards; it is simply larger, and the gift card line scales with it. Anyone telling you that a gift card push is what separates the quartiles is reading the absolute numbers and skipping the denominator.
What this does mean is that roughly 35 to 37 cents of every dollar across the entire system is collected before the service is delivered — making deferred revenue discipline a universal requirement here, not a top-performer habit.
Where the disclosure runs out, and what to ask instead.
Beyond volume and fixed-cost absorption, the filing simply does not say. Treatment-room utilization, average ticket, retail attachment, and rebooking rate are the plausible operating drivers — personnel at 44.1% of gross sales in the company-owned window makes revenue per labor hour the obvious pressure point — but none of them is disclosed, and we are not going to invent figures for them.
Worth asking the franchisor directly: average treatment-room utilization by daypart and what the top locations run; personnel cost as a percentage of sales across the franchised base rather than only the four company-owned spas; retail attachment rate; and the ramp curve to stabilized revenue.
One caution on the local advertising requirement.
Required local advertising is a percentage of sales, so it scales down exactly when it would need to scale up. At 1.75%, a top-quartile location spends about $75,396 while a bottom-quartile location spends about $23,074 — a $52,322 absolute gap. The location that most needs to drive traffic has the smallest budget to do it with, and the percentage-based requirement will not fix that on its own.
What this means for your finance function.
The system average is a poor planning number. With bands running from $1.3M to $4.3M, the $2,406,193 mean describes a location that barely exists. Underwrite to the band your site and operating capability can realistically reach, use the median as the base case, and use the bottom band as the downside.
Gift cards are a liability, not revenue. At roughly 35% of gross sales, this is the defining accounting feature of the model. A gift card is deferred revenue until redeemed — cash in the bank against a service you still owe. Booking gift card sales as income on sale inflates the selling period and leaves the redemption period delivering against revenue already recorded and often already spent. Unredeemed balances are handled as breakage under applicable revenue recognition and state escheatment rules. Our wellness franchise finance guide covers deferred revenue and membership economics in depth.
Personnel cost is the margin lever. In the company-owned window, personnel runs 44.1% of gross sales against a 16.0% spa-level EBITDA. Small movements in treatment-room utilization, service mix, and therapist productivity move the bottom line hard — which is exactly what weekly KPI reporting makes visible and a monthly P&L does not.
Note what franchised Item 19 does not tell you. It discloses gross sales only, with no franchisee cost or earnings data. Two locations at $2.4M with different rent and labor structures are different businesses. The company-owned table is a useful proxy but reflects four mature spas the franchisor operates itself. See FDD and Item 19 due diligence, and plan cash with a rolling forecast per franchise cash flow management.
Bookkeeping for a Woodhouse Spa franchise.
Roughly 35 cents of every dollar in this system arrives before the service is delivered. That single fact makes spa bookkeeping different from almost any other franchise category — and it is where most Woodhouse Spa books go wrong.
A Woodhouse Spa bookkeeper needs to handle four things a general bookkeeper typically will not:
- Gift cards as a liability, not revenue. A gift card is deferred revenue until it is redeemed — cash in the bank against a service you still owe. At 35% of gross sales this is not a footnote; booking gift card sales as income at the point of sale inflates the selling quarter and leaves the next one delivering against revenue already recorded and often already spent. Unredeemed balances then need handling as breakage under the applicable revenue recognition and state escheatment rules.
- Memberships and prepaid service packages. Same mechanic, different product. Recognized as services are delivered, not when the package is sold.
- Personnel cost cut by function. At roughly 44% of gross sales in the franchisor’s own company-owned disclosure, this is the largest line in the model. Therapist commission, front-desk and support wages, and management salary each move differently, and a single payroll figure hides which one is drifting.
- Service revenue separated from retail. Retail attachment raises revenue per treatment hour without using another minute of room time, which makes it one of the few levers that lifts the ceiling without capital. Blended into service revenue, you cannot see whether it is working.
Capital Advisors provides bookkeeping, controller support, and fractional CFO services for franchise owners. As an Intuit Elite-tier QuickBooks ProAdvisor firm, we handle the QuickBooks side of this directly — gift card and membership liability schedules that reconcile, booking-system and point-of-sale integration, and class or location tracking across multiple spas.
For owners with more than one location, that carries into multi-unit reporting: spa-level P&Ls on a consistent chart of accounts and a consolidated view you can actually act on.
Frequently asked questions.
How much does a Woodhouse Spa franchise make?
In the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document covering fiscal year 2025, the 81 franchised locations meeting reporting criteria averaged $2,406,193 in gross sales with a median of $2,155,304. Performance varies enormously by band: the top 25 percent averaged $4,308,376 while the bottom 25 percent averaged $1,318,522. Individual locations ranged from $816,325 to $6,830,937. Franchised Item 19 discloses gross sales only, with no franchisee cost or earnings data.
Why is there such a large gap between the best and worst Woodhouse locations?
The disclosed spread is roughly eight to one across a system where brand, playbook, and fee structure are identical, which points to operational and site-level factors rather than structural ones. Location quality and trade area, treatment-room utilization, service and retail mix, therapist productivity, and client retention are the usual drivers. That variance is why weekly operating metrics matter more here than in franchises with tighter performance distributions.
How important are gift cards to a Woodhouse Spa?
Very. Average gift card sales were $851,161 against average gross sales of $2,406,193, roughly 35 percent of the business, rising to about 36 percent in the top-performing band. Because gift cards are deferred revenue until redeemed, this concentration makes revenue recognition the defining accounting issue in the model, and it means cash collected and revenue earned routinely arrive in different periods.
Does Woodhouse disclose franchisee profitability?
Not for franchised locations. Item 19 discloses gross sales and gift card sales only, with no franchisee cost or earnings data, so margin at any revenue level is not represented for franchisees. The franchisor does disclose profitability for its four company-owned spas, which averaged $3,029,450 in gross sales and $484,591 in spa-level EBITDA, a 16.0 percent margin. That is a useful proxy but reflects only four mature locations the franchisor operates itself in Texas and Colorado.
Should I underwrite a new spa against the average or the median?
Neither in isolation. Because the franchisor reports in performance bands, the more useful approach is to identify which band your site and operating plan realistically support and underwrite to that, using the median as a base case and the bottom band as a downside. The system average of $2,406,193 sits between bands that differ by more than three times, so it describes very few actual locations.
Who does bookkeeping for a Woodhouse Spa franchise?
A Woodhouse Spa needs a bookkeeper who handles gift cards as a liability rather than revenue, since roughly 35 percent of gross sales in this system is collected before the service is delivered. The same applies to memberships and prepaid packages, and personnel cost needs to be cut by function rather than reported as one payroll figure. Capital Advisors provides bookkeeping, controller, and fractional CFO support for franchise owners and is an Intuit Elite-tier QuickBooks ProAdvisor firm.
Part of our Wellness & Fitness Franchise Finance guide · Franchise Finance Resource Center
Run your own numbers.
The Franchise Finance Diagnostic applies this logic to your figures — readiness scoring, Item 19 benchmarking, unit economics with ramp and seasonality, a 13-week cash forecast, and expansion gates. Free, and everything runs in your browser.
Working on this in your own business?
Capital Advisors provides franchise bookkeeping, fractional CFO support, and multi-unit financial reporting for franchisees and franchisors. Talk to us about your units →
Run these numbers against your own location.
A structured review of your unit economics, cash forecast, and reporting — so you can compare your actual performance against the disclosed system averages and know exactly where you stand.
Request the reviewFranchisor source. The complete, current Franchise Disclosure Document is available directly from the franchisor. Their franchise-sales site is here: Woodhouse Spa franchise development site — note that this is the franchisor’s own marketing and recruitment site, not an independent source, and Capital Advisors has no affiliation with it.

